Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

UNLABELLED: The victim's physical and emotional safety are foremost priorities in the clinical care of suspected child maltreatment (CM). The WHO recommends follow-ups, but we lack standardized procedures. This study examined case characteristics in relation to outcomes and follow-up (FU) feasibility at the Forensic Examination Center for Children and Adolescents (FOrensische Kinder- und JugendUntersuchungsStelle, FOKUS), Austria's first tertiary healthcare service offering regular FUs of CM cases. Suspected CM cases presented to FOKUS between July 2015 and June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed regarding one-year FU outcomes. FU feasibility, timing of FU, and reasons for delay or no FU were investigated. Two groups (FU vs. no FU) were compared. In the FU group, cases discharged from FOKUS services after the initial FU visit were compared with those remaining under FOKUS care regarding child protection (federal child protection service involvement, reports to law enforcement), safety procedures (new CM incidents, new injuries/findings/observations, contact with suspected perpetrator), and therapeutic interventions. Associations between case characteristics (age, gender, FU length, suspected CM type, perpetrator) and the groups were analyzed using logistic regression models. Of 219 cases, FU was feasible in 64%. Inaccessibility of families was the main reason for no FU. Followed patients were younger and perpetrators were more often parents (OR = 2.08, 95% CI 1.10-3.99). Suspected sexual abuse cases and those with new CM incidents were less frequently discharged (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.10-0.85 and OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.66). CONCLUSION: CM case characteristics permit personalized, structured FU planning and scheduling to improve safety and continuity of care. WHAT IS KNOWN: • The WHO recommends regular follow-up (FU) of suspected child maltreatment cases to ensure patient safety and prevent further harm, but standardized procedures are lacking. • In Austria, hospital-based child protection teams are legally required, yet systematic FUs and structured safety monitoring are rarely implemented nor legally required. WHAT IS NEW: • This first CM follow-up study from Austria's tertiary child protection service (FOKUS) shows that FU was feasible in 64% of cases. • The results suggest that case characteristics influence the success of FU. Structured, individualized FU and sufficient resources are essential to enhance patient safety and long-term protection.

More information Original publication

DOI

10.1007/s00431-026-06803-y

Type

Journal article

Publication Date

2026-02-23T00:00:00+00:00

Volume

185

Keywords

Child protection, Community child health, Non-accidental injury, Pediatric A&E and ambulatory care, Humans, Child Abuse, Child, Male, Retrospective Studies, Female, Child Protective Services, Child, Preschool, Adolescent, Follow-Up Studies, Infant, Austria, Tertiary Care Centers, Feasibility Studies