Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Click on the link to download supporting material for the following paper, which expands Appendix B to describe how the data were laid out in order to run the code shown in the Appendix and give the full code for Model 4: Dakin H. A., Welton N. J., Ades A. E., Collins S., Orme M., Kelly S. Mixed treatment comparison of repeated measurements of a continuous endpoint: an example using topical treatments for primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Stat Med 2011; 30, 2511-35.

If you use the information within this document, please cite it as: Dakin H. A., Welton N. J., Ades A. E., Collins S., Orme M., Kelly S. Mixed treatment comparison of repeated measurements of a continuous endpoint: an example using topical treatments for primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Stat Med 2011; 30, 2511-35. Supplementary information downloaded from downloaded from http://www.herc.ox.ac.uk/downloads/POAG.

Disclaimer While the authors have made every effort to ensure the reliability of this algorithm, they will not accept responsibility for any errors, omissions, inaccuracies or any consequences arising from the use of the algorithm. Users do so at their own risk. The values shown in tables in this document are purely for illustration and do not represent real trial data. Unfortunately we are not able to supply the dataset used in the meta-analysis.

Download