Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Perinatal interventions delivered during the prenatal period have the potential to directly impact prenatal life. The decision oil when to begin 'counting' the life of ail infant in the calculus has received little attention in previous economic evaluations of perinatal interventions. We illustrate, using data from a recent trial-based economic evaluation of magnesium sulphate given to women with pre-eclampsia to prevent eclampsia, how different definitions of when human life commences can have a significant impact upon cost-effectiveness estimates based oil composite Outcome measures such as life years or quality-adjusted life years gained or disability-adjusted life years averted. Further, we suggest ways in which methods in this area can be improved. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Original publication

DOI

10.1002/hec.1375

Type

Journal

Health Economics

Publication Date

2009

Volume

18

Pages

487 - 494

Keywords

prenatal life economic evaluation life year gained daly cost-effectiveness analysis magnesium-sulfate downs-syndrome magpie trial strategies preeclampsia diagnosis countries women care