Cookies on this website
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Continue' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

When collecting patient-level resource use data for statistical analysis, for some patients and in some categories of resource use, the required count will not be observed. Although this problem must arise in most reported economic evaluations containing patient-level data, it is rare for authors to detail how the problem was overcome. Statistical packages may default to handling missing data through a so-called 'complete case analysis', while some recent cost-analyses have appeared to favour an 'available case' approach. Both of these methods are problematic: complete case analysis is inefficient and is likely to be biased; available case analysis, by employing different numbers of observations for each resource use item, generates severe problems for standard statistical inference. Instead we explore imputation methods for generating 'replacement' values for missing data that will permit complete case analysis using the whole data set and we illustrate these methods using two data sets that had incomplete resource use information.

Original publication

DOI

10.1002/hec.766

Type

Journal

Health econ

Publication Date

05/2003

Volume

12

Pages

377 - 392

Keywords

Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Costs and Cost Analysis, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Efficiency, Humans, Laser Therapy, Length of Stay, Likelihood Functions, Male, Patient Dropouts, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Research Design, Transurethral Resection of Prostate